PDA

View Full Version : Please Beware of false teaching like this


Oldpreach
03-20-2003, 12:39 AM
This was taken from a thread in the open general discussion. It gets really bad near the middle and end. This was posted by a member here about whether women are to minister or lead. This was copied and posted by this member from an article by a pastor that i dont really know whether is in the truth or not. Go figure. Please just scan it over and notice some of the really bad fabrications and speculatory lines.

"WOMEN PREACHERS
God called and used women preachers in the Old Testament.


a. DEBORAH - Judges 4:4-5. Deborah was a Judge for both civil and criminal cases. The children of Israel came to her for judgment. She was the chief ruler of Israel for 40 years, giving orders to the Generals and all the army. She did the work of an evangelist, prophetess, Judge, and a preacher. God gave her authority over the mighty (Judges 5:13).

b. MIRIAM - Exodus 15:20; Numbers 12:1; Micah 6:4. She was a Prophetess and a Song Leader in Israel.

c. HULDAH - 2 Kings 22:14. Five men went to Sister Huldah and communed with her. She spoke to a congregation of men concerning the book of the Law. A female preached to a man's congregation, and her message was taken to the nation and produced a revival.

d. MAHER-SHALAL-HASH-BAZ'S MOTHER - Isaiah 8:3. She was a prophetess.


God called and used women preachers in the New Testament.
a. The first message of the Resurrection of Christ was spoken by women to a group of men.

b. Anna - Luke 2:36-38. She must have prophesied in church, because she did not depart from the temple.

c. Phillip had 4 daughters who prophesied. Acts 21:9.

d. Priscilla assisted Paul in his revival meeting and even taught Apollos in the way of the Lord more perfectly.

e. Phebe - Romans 16:1-2. Paul commended Phebe to the Church at Rome and requested that they assist her in her business. She was one of Paul's assistants in the work of the Lord and delivered the Book of Romans to the people from the hand of Paul.


There is no sound reason why a woman or man should not preach the Gospel. There is a desperate need in the church for more workers. Laborers are few, and God will use any and all who will go for Him. Some say God will not use a woman to preach, because "The woman was deceived," but remember Romans 5:12: "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world." It seems to indicate that Adam was just as guilty as Eve in the fall of man. If anyone should be kept from preaching because of sin, it would be Adam. But God does not forbid anyone from preaching, because of Adam's or Eve's sin.


1 Cor. 14: 34-35 does not say anything about women preachers. If Paul intended this verse as a general rule to bar all women from speaking in church, then they cannot teach Sunday School, testify, pray, prophesy, sing, or even get saved, and this would contradict the rest of the Bible (Acts 2:4; Acts 2:16-18).

Paul was rather dealing with a particular problem in the church. Women were not educated as were the men in that day; therefore the women would talk back and forth to their husbands in church and ask questions concerning the sermon. Paul said, "If they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." If they want to talk things over let them wait until they get home. This rule is still good for the church today, where people are talking and causing confusion in the church service. They should not speak in church. (Not in the back of the church either before or after services.)

If a woman cannot speak in church, then she cannot speak in prayer meeting, young people's service, etc., for who can deny that Sunday School and Prayer meeting, and Youth work are parts of church? Christ's Church is not a building, but rather it is found where two or three are gathered together in His name, whether at a street meeting, in a tent, a home, church, classroom or anywhere else.


1 Timothy 2:12 is not a blanket rule for all women of all churches. If it were, then the women could not speak at all, for the same verse that tells them not to teach also tells them to be silent.

If all women had to keep silent in church, then that would be promoting disobedience to God, for they could not prophesy, pray, testify, sing, exhort, do personal work, or even get saved.

Whenever an interpretation to a verse contradicts the rest of the teaching of the Bible, we know this interpretation is incorrect, for the Holy Spirit will never contradict His own Word.

This is the chief verse that is used to oppose women preaching and yet it says nothing about preaching, nor does it say anything about a public worship or church service. But, on the contrary, this verse is giving instructions to wives as to how they were to conduct themselves in regard to their husband. Paul says in 1 Cor. 14:35, "And if they will LEARN anything, let them ask their husbands at home." Now he states in 1 Tim. 2:12 that the woman should learn in silence, and should not usurp authority over the man. Paul is dealing with more of a home problem than a church problem.

This verse still applies to us today. It is wrong for a woman to usurp authority over her husband (in church, home, or any place else) as was the case in Paul's day. She should not try to teach him or speak words that would cause discord and confusion, but should rather be silent and in subjection to her husband.

It is also to be understood that if anyone, whether man or woman, is usurping authority over the God-given leadership of the church, she or he is to be silent, and not to teach, or act in such a way that would create discord in the assembly.


Some have used Titus 1:6-7, "If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children...", but there is a difference between a preacher and a bishop. For I was an Evangelist and now am a Pastor, but I am not a Bishop (Overseer), and most Pastors are not.

If God called a single man with no children to be a Bishop, as Paul was, surely this verse is not opposed to it, nor would this scripture oppose a woman Bishop if she was called of God for the work, as was Deborah.

What this verse does teach is that a person who is to be a Bishop must not have two living companions, either husbands or wives.

The Bible often speaks of "man" when it refers to both men and and women inclusively. The word "mankind" also includes both men and women. For an example of this word usage see 1 Cor. 13:1 - "Though I speak with the tongues of MEN and angels...." This word "MEN" includes women as well, for we do not have one language for men and another for women.


To condemn women preachers and women church workers is a serious offense, because God has stamped His approval on them by His Spirit over and over again, and who is man to fight against the Spirit of God?

To condemn women preachers and women church workers is in a sense to claim they are doing wrong and committing sin...and all those who support them and listen to them are having a part in that sin.

For anyone to do this, he must condemn approximately 99% of all the Spirit-filled believers and the vast majority of all of Christianity.

"Of a truth, I perceive that God is no respecter of persons..." (Acts 10:34)."

Hnovilla
03-20-2003, 01:20 PM
His Name is Jesus!

What is the 'intention' of the above thread on women 'preachers', Oldpreach? Of course it is to justify placing women in a man's position.
Church, we need to "Speak where the Bible speaks", and not forget that there is a very REAL place in the Church for our womenfolk. Yes, they DO prophecy and are urged to minister in ALL the gifts of the Spirit as well as the men. After all, these are gifts TO THE CHURCH, and FOR the Church. However, the Ministry (apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, and teacher) is NOT one of them. Many of our sisters feel they are called to evangelize, and / or to preach.
Beloved, preaching and evangelizing are TOOLS of the Ministry, but NOT the very Ministry itself.
Because there seems some confusion as to the Ministry of an Evangelist, I shall touch upon this in the most brief way.
Let's look at Phiilip, the Church's 'FIRST' evangelist. He began as a 'server'(deacon), and ended up evangelizing a whole 'nation' (Samaria). Phillip was NOT YET an evangelist (Ministry), but he did such an excellent job that he was later called"...Phillip the Evangelist...".
The Mnistry of Evangelist
The JOB DESCRIPTION of the Ministry is : "...for the perfecting of the saints, the work of the ministry, and the edification of the body of Christ." Therefore, the Ministry of Evangelism should fall under one of these descriptions. The Evangelist accomplishes this, first of all, by "...the Word of God and prayer..."
Today, the evangelist goes from city to city, preaching in campaigns, and holding 'revivals'. I believe we have gotten away from the REAL work of evangelism; which is, "...for the work of the ministry..."
If the Church is to excel in the work which we are called to perform, which is to "...shew forth the praises of Him who called you out of darkness and into His marvelous light...", we must be taught how to 'work out this ministry' of the Church. It will take am Evangelist to teach the Church the function of evangelism. THAT should be the Evangelist's PRIMARY work! Naturally, that would entail bringing BACK the New Testament Ministry.
"He that has ears to hear..."

Brother Villa

mfblume
03-24-2003, 04:09 PM
THE QUESTION OF WOMEN PREACHERS
Rev. David F. Gray

A controversy has been witnessed concerning the role of women in the church. As with all controversies, there are factions. One one hand, the unlearned wrestle with the scriptures to their own destruction, and on the other hand, the untaught are tested as to their regard for scripture, and for the church.

This is a broad subject, but I am confident that we can convey and put in order the teaching of the church in a few words. No doubt, the result of apostolic teaching will be order and peace, not imagined but real and genuine.

There will be those who cannot abide in peace, but this is accounted for and it should not shock the young Christian. Indeed:

"But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God." - 1Co 11:16

We must allow the final authority to be established by the apostles, through the scriptures.

So what saith the scripture:

Being read alone ...
"Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." - Tim 2:11-12 ... has led some to say that women have no place in teaching, preaching or prophesying, and leave it at that. Of course, this does create quite an issue. Without further elaboration, it simply strikes at the nature and essence of half of the human race.

What does this passage mean? First, what does it not mean:

(1) It does not mean that a woman cannot prophesy. The prophecy of Joel fulfilled at Pentecost according to the demonstration of the Spirit and the preaching of Acts 2:17-18 clearly indicates an inclusion of women to be used in prophecy.

Where? Some will say "in private". However we realize that prophecy is for the edification of the church (1 Corinthians 14:3-4). Acts 12:9 reveals Philip's daughters as prophetesses. It was renowned that these four women prophesied.

Since prophecy is the use of a human vessel for speaking the direct word of God under the unction of the Holy Ghost, anointed teaching and preaching cannot be excluded from the ministry of women, scripturally.

(2) 2 Tim 2:11-12 does not mean women cannot pray, or that they should pray silently. 1 Cor 11:4-5 indicates that the head of the woman must be covered so as to properly honor her head WHILE praying. Furthermore, the same verse connects prophesying, and incorporates the same criteria. Speaking to the church in edification and comfort while under subject to headship is evidently depicted as a common operation of women in the of the ordained church.

(3) It does not mean that a woman cannot teach. In Titus 2:3-4 scriptural circumstances depicting women as teachers is given. Also, if expounding and teaching can be considered synonymous (I hope it is in my ministry:), Priscilla and her husband Aquilla did indeed teach one of the great apostolic preachers of the first generation, Apollos (Acts 18:26).

Thus, we can conclude that the *silence* cautioned by Paul in the scripture text does NOT exclude women from exercising scripturally endorsed ministry. As with men, there are conditions for such ministry, and they need to be understood and not neglected 'lest confusion and damage result.

So, then to what DOES 1 Tim 2:11-12 refer?

In 1 Tim 2:11, the silence is to be "with all subjection". This qualifies the silence. Verse 12 elaborates on the reason. "... I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man.." As we have seen the ministries are available to women, but not unless she is under authority to a man.

We do not have General Board members who are women, as there is no need, however, under the authority of the presbytery, women have been pastors, and of course, powerful missionaries. Often, women are willing to do things to which men will not rise, and are ordained of God as an example of godliness and SUBMISSION, which the men who default in their responsibility and holiness are not a party. Men who are not under authority and as useless and unscriptural as women who are not.

So, the restriction to a woman's use in the ministry or in public meeting, is that such ministry must be under the authority of men. Our problem though, sometimes arises with MEN who do not WANT to be under ANY authority and will therefor use these verses as excuse for their own rebellion. I know of one such man who fed the rebellion of his heart when his pastor's daughter was appointed to lead a music ministry. Rather than praying through, and working in harmony with the pastor, who of course, his daughter represented in this case, the man determined that the pastor's ministry was unscriptural. It is clear that he was seeking an excuse for defiance, for the answer is never in rebellion. In such cases, improper and partial readings of the scripture are used to attempt to bolster the "case" of such individuals, but the Bible allows no contention over such matters.

Second, the passage in 1 Corinthians 14 deals mostly with women LEARNING, not teaching. Again, 1 Tim 2:11 says "Let the woman learn in silence..."

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." - 1 Cor 14:34-35

The unlearned women often interrupted the services with questions, and comments. Paul addressed these *interruptions*, pointing out that the subjection of woman to husband also required the husband and wife to act in such a way that order was maintained in the church. ("it is a shame for women to speak in the church")

The distractions were to be brought in under reign of the husband, where he could fulfill his responsibility by teaching these issues at home (much as Adam ought to have:) ("...let them ask their husbands at home..." )

In these days, those who ignorantly maintain an absolute prohibition against women in public ministry must do so in clear defiance of the Word of God. Ignorance serves as an excuse to the untaught, but to seriously malign the female half of the human race unscripturally, and in so doing make accusation against the Church of the Living God is poorly motivated to say the least. We feel no reluctance to apply the highly charged and often overused term, "sexist" to such commentary.

To see women minister in missionary, and evangelistic work labouring tirelessly, giving their lives in establishing churches is awe inspiring. And, it is truly Apostolic. Let God have his way in every life, and let everything be done properly!

Adoniyah
03-24-2003, 06:19 PM
Thanks brother Blume.

I always loved the wisdom of brother Gray. I knew him for many years. After his retirment, we were blessed by his ministry here in Houston a number of times. We always received so much good food from his immense wisdom. He was truly a great teacher.

tufluv
03-26-2003, 11:29 AM
:grumble: :grumble: :grumble:

Thelordisone
03-26-2003, 11:55 AM
hnovilla & bro blume,

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"For all scripture is inspired by God and is good for reproof, instuction, direction, to instruct in justice so that the man of God may be entirely furnished for every good work!!" 2Tim3:16&17

IN HIS NAME!!

ddc101
03-26-2003, 02:08 PM
Bro.Gray also wrote many books.A good asset to a pastors library would be Questions Pentecostals Ask....there is two or three volumes.lv sis.c

Sandy
03-26-2003, 02:11 PM
Hinovilla, could you please supply the scripture that reveals when Philip became an evangelist. Because it was me that suggested evangelists, pastors and teachers may have been orginally called deacons in the beginning because of the meaning of this phrase in the Greek. So of course, if I am wrong, I would like to kknow. Which is why I ask for something within the scriptures that indicates this change in ministry at least. I hope you understand I know I could be wrong, but would like to have something to go by that says I am. Especially in light of the meaning of deacon to begin with.

Sandy
03-26-2003, 02:32 PM
Bro. Blume,

I agree with what you wrote.

I also do not believe anyone that wrote believing that women do indeed walk in the ministry gifts are saying they should not be in subjection to those that have the authority over them at all. And to their husbands first and foremost. But rather saying their are women that are called to walk in these ministry gifts none the less. If I am understanding you Pastor Blume, this is also what you believe as well.

Hnovilla
04-07-2003, 09:00 PM
His Name is Jesus!

Sister Sandy, you asked: "...the scripture that reveals where Phillip first became an evangelist..."
Beloved, there is scripture that shows where Phillip waited on the tables (which we call deacon) for the 'non-Jewish' members of the Church. They also state how he went and 'evangelized' (preached Jesus unto them) the Samaritans. He was never called an evangelist until later, when Luke the physician said that they stayed with "...Phillip, the EVANGELIST...", who also had daughters who profesied.
This, taken with the revelation of the five-fold Ministry by the Apostle Paul leads us to conclude that Phillip, by the time he was visited by Luke and party, had already received the 'calling' of Evangelist.
I believe the scriptures teach that ALL the Ministry operates in at least one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit; but not everyone who exercises a gift is necessarily a Minister. By the same token, the Ministry's primary function is to SERVE (diakonos); but not every deacon has a calling into the Ministry.
I have read many posts, and see that many in the Church are a little confused concerning the many 'helps' and the Ministry, itself.
"...precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, there a little..."

Brother Villa

tufluv
04-07-2003, 11:15 PM
HNOVILLA:
AND is it not also correct that a saint may have a certain gift for say a ltd. time use, as the need is present? Such as interpretation of tongues? and then not use it again for a long time, if ever? and also maybe get the use of another gift as well, such as healing?
I read something somewhere back a few years and it stuck with me.
NOW, if you don't feel like answering this just yet, its okay, its not like an urgent question or anything, haven't seen you in a bit, Hno.! glad you're back!:)

Hnovilla
04-11-2003, 06:43 PM
His Name is Jesus!

Beloved, I believe the scriptures teach that each saint has a gift FROM His Spirit, and we are responsible for exercising it.
I have purposely emphasized 'from' because many saintsd seem also to confuse the gift 'which is' the Holy Spirit, and the 'gift' which this portion of the Lord's Spirit brings.
Whenever the Lord needs to speak/minister to His Church, He can do so in one of His 'gifts'. Now if the 'gifts' are hindered or quashed, as in many places, the Lord will operate in the person who is most sensitive to His will.
Too often, the Ministry is looked upon as the logical person(s) to exercise the 'gifts'; but we must remember that they have been given to the Church. I must also add, the work of evangelism has NOT been given to a few ministers, but also to the Church.
We need to "get back to the basics" that the Primitive Church employed, and let modernism fasll by the wayside.

Brother Villa

bishop1
04-13-2003, 05:36 PM
Question:
How can a woman be a Pastor and not usurp authority over a man ?

Answer:
SHE CAN NOT !

*This problem started in the Garden of Eden.

ddc101
04-13-2003, 05:42 PM
bishop1,
this is your opinion.I know of several ladies who pastor and work very well with their sectional presbyters and dist.Supt.
Also I know of ladies such as our beautiful sister Alvear who go in faith and obey Jesus and have done a wonderful work for Jesus.
Honestly I hate these kind of threads.To say a woman who is fulfilling the call of pastor is unsubmissive is very judgemental.

In His Service
04-14-2003, 02:09 PM
Sister C.,
Guess this is one that we will disagree upon.

Bro. timothy

Hnovilla
04-14-2003, 08:50 PM
His Name isJesus!

Beloved, it is alsoaplace where we can agree.

Church, there is a place of ministering to the world, and another to the each other as the Church. But the Ministry is FOR the Church! "...and He gave gifts unto men...apostles, prophets..." The Ministry IS NOT a gift to a man, but the Lord's gift to the Church.
There is so much more that can be said, but whosoever will receive it only has to study the scriptures. Those who will not, will not.

Brother Villa

Thelordisone
04-16-2003, 03:42 PM
hnovilla,

Amen!! Especially your last sentence!!

God Bless,

PS You never told me if you know Willie Mendoza?