PDA

View Full Version : Love & Doctrine


Alesaggio
12-12-2007, 01:28 PM
---------------

We need to refresh our minds and hearts with the Biblical admonition --"Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. He who does not love does not know God, for God is love. There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear. And this commandment we have from Him: that he who loves God must love his brother also."

Who could argue that of all the things found in the New Testament, the principle that we should love one another should have a common and comprehensive approval from all Christians?

However, we must not forget that we also find a creed, an insistence on a very narrow, very specific, very inflexible doctrine concerning Jesus Christ.

We will find that a love of God and belief of a doctrine - a specific doctrine of faith - are linked together inseparably. Jesus Christ was the perfect example of the union of love and doctrine - who would argue with that fact?

The temptation that presses itself on some preachers is to abandon one or the other of the two things which the Scriptures repeatedly link together. And, so, some have abandoned their love for the brethren in order to guard, protect, defend, and proclaim the doctrine concerning Jesus. And, when this has happened, when they have let go of the commandment to love the brethren, there has usually been a fireworks display of havoc and heartless harshness to be found in the wake of this abandonment.

Then, of course, there are those who cannot hold love and doctrine together. If one places fellowship-at-all-costs then they may choose instead to abandon the doctrine. This seems to be prevlant today in Pentecost.

If abandoning Jesus' command to love one another leads to a wholesale destruction of good fellowship, then abandoning the Biblical doctrines of salvation, holiness and godliness leads to a wholesale destruction of churches. Those that abandon holiness doctrines to preserve so-called "unity" soon allow other doctrinal issues to be sacrificed in the name of "getting along."

Admitted - History shows just how easy it has been to fall off the horse on one side or the other - to proclaim the doctrine WITHOUT the love of the brethren, or to attempt to love the brethren BY AVOIDING so far as possible the doctrines which makes the Oneness faith the Church that Jesus Christ is building in this untoward world.

Then there are those that strive to love the brethren and preach the doctrine. May we all pray that we seek this Jesus like path! Jesus Christ IS the Perfect Union of Love and Doctrine.

Love You Brother -- But I'm Gonna Preach To You!


----

jhlent
12-12-2007, 11:54 PM
---------------

We need to refresh our minds and hearts with the Biblical admonition --"Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. He who does not love does not know God, for God is love. There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear. And this commandment we have from Him: that he who loves God must love his brother also."


Love You Brother -- But I'm Gonna Preach To You!

----

Well I am awaiting....
I desire to hear the "Rest of the Story"


Wonderful as usual "BUT" to short



(check your pm's)

Evangelist Paul
12-15-2007, 06:43 PM
I appreciat the post that started this thread. From the time I was young I have seen people trying to keep this balance with some falling on either side along the way.

My question becomes this; what does one do when ones love for the truth leads one to a doctrinal position that others call "compromise" and easy believism?

What happens when one understands the kind of love that Jesus taught which causes the unacceptable (the Samaritan) to do what what the revered (Levite and Priest) would not do? Notice Jesus made no reference to the fact that this man may not have held closely to the religion of the Jews.

After many years of careful and prayerful study of scripture I find ample scriptural evidence to believe that the Bible meant what it said when it says "Except you believe I am he you will die in your sins," (John8:24)- But: who is the "he" that he was talking about? He explains in verse 28; "When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things" - It appears that he was talking about the "he" being the Son who had been taught by the Father."

Now, I know that many teach that the "he" that Jesus was referring to was the Father, but he clarifies that in v28.

What is my purpose in bringing this up? Actually, I am addressing the question of love and doctrine, or love vs doctrine. If I accept Jesus as God manifest in the flesh and the only one who's blood can atone for my sins, can I be accepted as a brother, even if I don't explain the Father-Son relationship the same way as you?

Does our love of doctrine preclude us from accepting a brother who's doctrine is very nearly the same as ours except for a few words that have tended to divide people of faith?

Just some musings of an old man.